“…. humanists, having no god, must put something at the center, and it is inevitably society, government, or the state …. the Judeo-Christian consensus … has weakened and all but disappeared, [along] with the lack of vision even from a pragmatic perspective, let alone principle ….”Francis A. Schaeffer, A Christian Manifesto, in The Complete Works of Francis A. Schaeffer, Volume 5, a Christian View of the West. (Crossway Books, Wheaton Illinois, 1982), p. 482
Francis Schaeffer was an American Presbyterian minister, philosopher, evangelist and apologist who, for thirty-five years after World War 2, lived and worked in Europe, based in Switzerland. He and his wife Edith founded L’Abri Fellowship in Chesières, Switzerland 1955. Schaeffer died in 1984, but his thought and work has continued to exercise a profound influence on the thousands who met him and listened to and studied under him, as well as the millions who have read his books. Few Christian thinkers through the last two millennia have created such a well-articulated and carefully thought-out and practiced view of both humanity and the cosmos.
In the summer of 1979 at Swiss L’Abri (there are other locations) my partner and I met and talked with the Schaeffers for a time almost daily as we worked at their chalet and in their garden. His works and thought continue to exercise a profound influence on me. Like all men, he was faulted, but he never betrayed his primary commitments to Yeshua, to Edith, to his family. He strove to live what he taught, and to a large extent succeeded.
Schaeffer was not apolitical, but he was not partisan political either. Politics is an inevitable concomitant of living in society, and, with few exceptions, humans cannot avoid living in society. Even such exceptions almost always find society (other humans they attract) coming to them even as they attempt to escape it. The story of Anthony of Egypt (250-356 CE) graphically illustrates this.
Anthony sought to live as a hermit in the Egyptian desert in order to escape the corruption and distractions of the big city (Alexandria, Egypt) and to live a “pure life” dedicated to knowing God. People heard about this radical holy man and began to come to him. After twenty years of trying to be a hermit, he rather found himself a “Father” to a growing community of hundreds of God-seekers. Despite himself he founded a community that focused on union with God first. In 311, at the height of a terrible persecution, he was sent by his Lord back to the city to bring warning and to preach repentance to a corrupt and tumultuous populace and administration which threatened to kill him for his trouble. He hoped to be gifted with martyrdom, but was not. Instead he brought conviction and hope to the suffering Christians and confusion to the Emperor’s agents. There is much more to Anthony’s story, but the reader can find the details elsewhere.
With respect to the Christian aspiration to a Third Way, the most common mistake is in identifying a particular set of ideological posits and positions as where peacemakers and searchers after justice and true equity must commit themselves. Taking up a party cause and socio-economic ideology has never led to the real objective of the Christ’s Third Way, which is the birthing of “the Kingdom of Heaven” on earth.
Schaeffer advocated civil disobedience, even at the risk of persecution and imprisonment. He stood in a long line of Christian disciples from Peter and John the Apostles telling the Judean Sanhedrin “Judge for yourselves if we should obey God or you” (my paraphrase) when they had been arrested and told not to mention the name of Yeshua or teach anything about him among the people. That line travels through time across twenty centuries down to Dietrich Bonhoeffer in Nazi Germany and the tens of thousands of anonymous martyrs in the Soviet Bloc and even China and North Korea right now. Nor must we forget the quiet efforts to bring hope and freedom to love and speak truth of Christians in Islamic societies where they have a death sentence fatwa hanging over their heads which anyone can carry out and be immune to punishment. More thousands have been put to death there.
But the Third Way is not primarily about civil disobedience to unjust governments. It is about pointing to and working towards a different way of doing life in the here and now, a way that puts a premium on compassion and empathy and real, practical efforts to stand with the victims of injustice and oppression and neglect and denial of the most basic elements of human dignity. It is about being Christ’s “body” even in the middle of whatever version of “this age/cosmos” prevails at the moment wherever the scorn for the Creator and the callous treatment of those made in His/Her image is reducing God’s human children to mere animals or tools to be used to enhance the power, wealth, prestige and personal glory of whichever set of haters and oppressors holds power at the moment.
It is about showing another way among the community of those who name the name of Yeshua/Jesus as Lord, about practicing the principles of His Kingdom among themselves and trying to bring some of that influence into expression in the larger society and culture.
Because that has been the calling and mission of the disciples of Yeshua/Jesus since he commissioned his ekklesia – the assembly of the people called to follow him and live as God’s children in the midst of what Jesus called “a wicked generation” – the koinonia, the community of love and compassion He meant for His disciples to become and be, has never been, was never meant to be, a closed, secret society. It was never meant to be merely another human-created institution interested in gaining political and economic power and compelling everyone to go along with its agenda.
That agenda is quite simple – bringing the Kingdom of God into real manifestation here on earth. But, as ever with flawed humans being the agents, great transgressions were committed and brought (and bring) great discredit to all Yeshua’s followers. Those who hear the talk about all the wonderful ideals of the coming Kingdom are justified in holding Christians accountable for acting just like the usual human authorities.
Historically, it is no surprise that the failures and excesses of the official leaders of Christianity here in the West, where they gained great political, social, and economic power, should have led to the present situation. The loss of the power and influence of the Church (churches) is lamented by many Christians, but too often as a sort of political and social deprivation rather than as it should be – a repentance for having fallen into the perpetual temptation to take the road to compulsory control using the levers of position and coercion. The reduction of the Church’s power and influence and its being shunted to the periphery would be better seen as an opportunity to do a reset and a return to first love, a true repentance, rather than as a trumpet call to take up political weapons to try to restore something that would better have been left aside in the first place.
Much more has been better said on all this by many down through the centuries and the last two millennia. For two thousand years, the Lord’s Prayer has warned us and continues to warn us about taking the wrong path. Its priorities are explicit and crystal clear: “Creator’s Kingdom, come! Creator’s will, be done! On earth as in heavenly realms.” The original is as much an imperative as a plea. It is a command, a mandate.
But the practical side is also crystalline: “Give us today our daily bread” – a request that we receive what we need (not want, lust after, crave to get) materially in the here and now. This is for two purposes – first so that we can carry on with the business of bringing God’s Kingdom into this age for as long as we are here, and second so that we can meet the needs of others who do not have enough and so show them the real love of their Creator.
This amazing masterpiece of prayer, which is the format for all prayer and relationship with our Maker, ends with “And do not lead us into (“lead” is not the best translation of the Greek word –more like do not let us fall into) temptation, but deliver us from evil (again, the Greek is better rendered as the evil one).”
It is an indivisible unity which we too often treat as separate pieces, compartmentalized to suit our own purposes. The greatest temptation for each of us, for leaders, and for the ekklesia as a body is to take up the apparently easiest and most direct path to “bringing in the Kingdom”. The temptation, the allure, is to outpolitick the politicos and cleverly dominate the social molders of “this age” who hold the reins (and reigns) of power and control. It is the song of Odysseus’s Sirens luring us onto the rocks of shipwreck.
We will give the last word in this series to Yeshua. Shimon (Peter), the prospective leader off the ekklesia after Jesus, took out a sword and used it in an attempt to stop the arresters who had come to take Jesus to be crucified. Yeshua sharply reprimanded him, “Enough of that! If you live by the sword, you die by the sword!”
2 thoughts on “The Third Way, 60 – Walking the Walk”
Great blog, Vince. One of my favourites!
LikeLiked by 1 person